Check-in / Check-out Comparison

An objective differential report that places both inventory reports side by side to identify, classify and document any discrepancies between check-in and check-out.

The Essential Tool at the End of a Tenancy

The check-in / check-out comparison is the document that transforms two raw records into a usable analysis. By superimposing the observations from the check-in report on those from check-out, room by room and element by element, it highlights discrepancies in a factual and measurable way.

This report goes beyond a simple observation: it classifies each discrepancy (fair wear and tear or damage) and provides factual, reasoned documentation. It is the tool that turns a subjective disagreement into an objective discussion.

Room-by-Room Side-by-Side Comparison

Our comparison report follows a parallel column structure that allows differences to be read at a glance:

Element
Check-in Condition
Check-out Condition
North wall – living room
White paint, good condition
Fixing marks, 3 wall plug holes
Kitchen floor
Stoneware tiles, new condition
Cracked tile, south-east corner
Bedroom 1 door
Good condition, lacquered paint
Good condition, normal wear

Simplified example. The actual report details each element with comparative photos and classification of the discrepancy.

Differential Table

The differential table lists exclusively the elements for which a discrepancy has been found between check-in and check-out. Each row details the nature of the discrepancy and its classification: fair wear and tear or damage attributable to the tenant.

This distinction is fundamental: fair wear and tear, resulting from normal use over time, remains the landlord's responsibility. Damage, on the other hand, is documented rigorously and with reasoned argument, drawing on comparative photographic evidence, to allow the parties to reach an objective resolution.

Pricing

All prices excl. VAT (20% VAT applicable) — Key collection included — Volume discounts available

Frequently asked questions

Yes, we can produce the comparison using any check-in inventory report, whether produced by us or by another professional. We base the comparison on the elements documented in the original report. The quality of the comparison does, however, depend on the precision of the initial document.

Absolutely. The wear and tear coefficient is applied in accordance with the schedule annexed to the lease where one exists, or according to generally recognised case law. For example, paintwork that is 10 years old showing signs of normal use will not give rise to any deduction, as its conventional lifespan is generally estimated at between 7 and 10 years.

Our comparison report constitutes admissible evidence before civil courts and departmental conciliation commissions. Its evidential value is strengthened by our independence, methodological rigour and the accompanying timestamped photographic documentation.

Certifications & guarantees

📜

ALUR Act

Reports fully compliant with French tenancy law of 24 March 2014

🔐

eIDAS certification

Qualified electronic signature for legally enforceable documents

🛡️

Professional indemnity insurance

Full professional indemnity cover for your peace of mind

🤝

Independence

No affiliation with any estate agency or landlord

Bring Objectivity to the End of the Tenancy

A rigorous comparison report for a security deposit return free from dispute.